<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using more than 3 Gb of RAM with 32-bit Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/</link>
	<description>Ubuntu, I &#039;buntu, We all &#039;buntu, (but only if we want&#039;u).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Glassman</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Glassman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the write up. Worked great in our VM environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the write up. Worked great in our VM environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. Steinert</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. Steinert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>Perry: Thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perry: Thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perry</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>Kurt: The new kernel will only become active after a reboot (and should normally be at the top of the GRUB menu, so will boot by default). Are sure you are running a 32-bit version of Ubuntu :) ? If you see 4 Gb &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; a reboot, then I&#039;d say you don&#039;t need the PAE kernel and are probably running a 64-bit kernel.
You can find out which kernel you are running with:
uname -a
and it&#039;s architecture specifically with:
uname -m
If this says x86_64 or ia64, you are already running a 64-bit kernel. In this case, I can&#039;t see any good reason to run the PAE kernel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt: The new kernel will only become active after a reboot (and should normally be at the top of the GRUB menu, so will boot by default). Are sure you are running a 32-bit version of Ubuntu <img src='http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ? If you see 4 Gb <i>before</i> a reboot, then I&#8217;d say you don&#8217;t need the PAE kernel and are probably running a 64-bit kernel.</p>
<p>You can find out which kernel you are running with:</p>
<p>uname -a</p>
<p>and it&#8217;s architecture specifically with:</p>
<p>uname -m</p>
<p>If this says x86_64 or ia64, you are already running a 64-bit kernel. In this case, I can&#8217;t see any good reason to run the PAE kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perry</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2970</link>
		<dc:creator>perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2970</guid>
		<description>R.J: It seems every time a new -generic kernel update it released, the -generic-pae comes out at the same time, so from Ubuntu / Canonicals side it seems to be maintained as a first-class option with regard to security updates etc. The PAE kernel and the &#039;regular&#039; kernel are generated from the same source tree - there isn&#039;t a separate code base for the PAE version, just a compile time flag CONFIG_X86_PAE=y, so while different, they can&#039;t easily diverge too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.J: It seems every time a new -generic kernel update it released, the -generic-pae comes out at the same time, so from Ubuntu / Canonicals side it seems to be maintained as a first-class option with regard to security updates etc. The PAE kernel and the &#8216;regular&#8217; kernel are generated from the same source tree &#8211; there isn&#8217;t a separate code base for the PAE version, just a compile time flag CONFIG_X86_PAE=y, so while different, they can&#8217;t easily diverge too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2969</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2969</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this.  I am kind of curious though.  I never rebooted and free -m is showing the full 4gb as available.  Now I am not sure what to do on reboot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this.  I am kind of curious though.  I never rebooted and free -m is showing the full 4gb as available.  Now I am not sure what to do on reboot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. Steinert</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. Steinert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>Good point, I&#039;m now running the  linux-generic-pae kernel and just ran into the &#039;custom compiled kernel module&#039; problem with VirtualBox.  I had to install the linux-headers-generic-pae package to get VirtualBox to recompile its own kernel module.
Recompiling kernel modules is a minor inconvenience, I&#039;m more worried that the linux-generic-pae package isn&#039;t maintained as closely as the non pae package.  I&#039;m not familiar with how Linux kernel development goes but do you think it&#039;s possible that the stock linux Kernel that Ubuntu comes with and what comes with the linux-generic-pae package could drastically fork?
Thanks for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, I&#8217;m now running the  linux-generic-pae kernel and just ran into the &#8216;custom compiled kernel module&#8217; problem with VirtualBox.  I had to install the linux-headers-generic-pae package to get VirtualBox to recompile its own kernel module.  </p>
<p>Recompiling kernel modules is a minor inconvenience, I&#8217;m more worried that the linux-generic-pae package isn&#8217;t maintained as closely as the non pae package.  I&#8217;m not familiar with how Linux kernel development goes but do you think it&#8217;s possible that the stock linux Kernel that Ubuntu comes with and what comes with the linux-generic-pae package could drastically fork?</p>
<p>Thanks for your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perry</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>I bit of digging ( &lt;a href=&quot;https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EnablingPAE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Enabling PAE&quot;&lt;/a&gt; ), and I discovered that in fact older versions of Ubuntu didn&#039;t have PAE enabled in the stock &quot;linux-generic&quot; kernel either .. you needed to use the &quot;linux-server&quot; kernels in 9.04 to get PAE support. With 9.10+ there are PAE kernel packages called &quot;linux-generic-pae&quot;. I don&#039;t think there is any simple switch that can be flicked to make the default &quot;linux-generic&quot; kernel support PAE as-is - I&#039;m assuming it hasn&#039;t been enabled at compile time.
Personally I don&#039;t really see installing a variant of Ubuntu&#039;s official kernels as all that drastic - regular Ubuntu updates will typically upgrade the default &quot;-generic&quot; kernel several times a year anyway, and most people wouldn&#039;t even notice that it&#039;s happening except that they are prompted with &quot;Restart required&quot; after apt-get upgrades a kernel. Installing the &quot;-pae&quot; variant is barely any different.
[For the ultra geeky: You could download the &quot;-generic&quot; and equivalent &quot;-generic-pae&quot; kernel source and do a &#039;diff&#039; between them .. I bet there are very few source code changes, other than the config flag that says &quot;compile the PAE stuff&quot; (no time to check that myself just now, unfortunately). ]
In the case where you are using your own custom compiled kernel modules (or custom kernel), yeh, then changing kernels is drastic - but then anyone doing that would probably be comfortable with it anyhow :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bit of digging ( <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EnablingPAE" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Enabling PAE&#8221;</a> ), and I discovered that in fact older versions of Ubuntu didn&#8217;t have PAE enabled in the stock &#8220;linux-generic&#8221; kernel either .. you needed to use the &#8220;linux-server&#8221; kernels in 9.04 to get PAE support. With 9.10+ there are PAE kernel packages called &#8220;linux-generic-pae&#8221;. I don&#8217;t think there is any simple switch that can be flicked to make the default &#8220;linux-generic&#8221; kernel support PAE as-is &#8211; I&#8217;m assuming it hasn&#8217;t been enabled at compile time.</p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t really see installing a variant of Ubuntu&#8217;s official kernels as all that drastic &#8211; regular Ubuntu updates will typically upgrade the default &#8220;-generic&#8221; kernel several times a year anyway, and most people wouldn&#8217;t even notice that it&#8217;s happening except that they are prompted with &#8220;Restart required&#8221; after apt-get upgrades a kernel. Installing the &#8220;-pae&#8221; variant is barely any different.</p>
<p>[For the ultra geeky: You could download the "-generic" and equivalent "-generic-pae" kernel source and do a 'diff' between them .. I bet there are very few source code changes, other than the config flag that says "compile the PAE stuff" (no time to check that myself just now, unfortunately). ]</p>
<p>In the case where you are using your own custom compiled kernel modules (or custom kernel), yeh, then changing kernels is drastic &#8211; but then anyone doing that would probably be comfortable with it anyhow <img src='http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. Steinert</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2966</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. Steinert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2966</guid>
		<description>Replacing the Kernel to enable PAE seems kind of drastic.  Perhaps there is a way to tell Ubuntu to use the same Kernel with PAE enabled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replacing the Kernel to enable PAE seems kind of drastic.  Perhaps there is a way to tell Ubuntu to use the same Kernel with PAE enabled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perry</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>@Patrick: I&#039;d say there is some other issue - the 64 bit kernel should see all your RAM without needing a PAE kernel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick: I&#8217;d say there is some other issue &#8211; the 64 bit kernel should see all your RAM without needing a PAE kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/2010/06/22/using-more-than-3-gb-of-ram-with-32-bit-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/comment-page-1/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 12:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxblog.pansapiens.com/?p=62#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t work for me either on my ubuntu 10.04 2.6.32-24-generic-pae. I even tried installing directly the 64bits version of ubuntu 10.04 and free -m still only 3Gb. In the bios i can see the 4Gb ram installed. Computer is an HP dv6355ea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t work for me either on my ubuntu 10.04 2.6.32-24-generic-pae. I even tried installing directly the 64bits version of ubuntu 10.04 and free -m still only 3Gb. In the bios i can see the 4Gb ram installed. Computer is an HP dv6355ea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

